• À propos
    • Notre équipe
  • Produits
  • Nous contacter
  • Certificats de qualité
  • Enquête clinique
  • Éducation
    • Articles & Références
    • Save That Tooth
  • ACTIVA BioACTIVE
    • Les bases de la bioactivité
    • Aperçu d’ACTIVA BioACTIVE
    • Recherches d’ACTIVA BioACTIVE
    • Bulk Fill Bioactif
    • Conseils pratiques ACTIVA BioACTIVE
  • Catalogue
  • Prévention
  • Save That Tooth – Aperçu
  • Save That Tooth – Études de cas
Contactez-nous
0
Fr
  • Portugais
  • Italien
  • Espagnol
  • Anglais
  • Allemand
© 2015-2021 PULPDENT™ Corporation. All rights reserved.
PULPDENT PULPDENT
Fr
  • Portugais
  • Italien
  • Espagnol
  • Anglais
  • Allemand
Nous contacter
  • À propos
    • Notre histoire
    • Nous contacter
    • Notre équipe
    • Certificats de qualité
  • Produits
    • –
      • Catégories
        • ACTIVA™
        • Restauration
        • Fond de cavité
        • Ciment – Collage
        • Adhésif
        • Mordançage
    • –
      •  
        • Prophylaxie
        • Endodontie
        • Orthodontie
        • Divers
        • Accessoires
        • Embouts
  • Catalogue
  • Enquête clinique
  • Éducation
    • Articles & Références
    • Save That Tooth
      • Save That Tooth – Aperçu
      • Save That Tooth – Études de cas
  • Prévention
  • Actions Humanitaires
  • ACTIVA BioACTIVE
0
activa bioactive logo
activa-seringues-2
Les bases de la bioactivité
Aperçu d'ACTIVA™ BioACTIVE™
Recherches d'ACTIVA™ BioACTIVE™
BioACTIVE Bulk Fill
Conseils pratiques
PULPDENT

ACTIVA™ BioACTIVE – RESTAURATION

Accueil / Pulpdent-products / ACTIVA™ BioACTIVE – RESTAURATION

Caractéristiques :

Esthétique naturelle – Très facile à polir
Robuste, résilient, résistant à l’usure et aux fractures
Libère et recharge le calcium, le phosphate et le fluorure
Liaison chimique – Scellement contre les micro-fuites
Stimule la reminéralisation et la formation d’apatite
Hydrophile – Technique simplifiée

Propriétés Bioactives
Propriétés Physiques

Description :

ACTIVA BioACTIVE – RESTAURATION est le premier matériau de restauration bioactif qui combine les avantages des composites, des verres ionomères et des CVIMARs sans leurs inconvénients. C’est une combinaison sans équivalent qui combine les propriétés physiques et chimiques afin de procurer bioactivité, esthétique, dureté, résilience, durabilité et intégrité marginale. ACTIVA BioACTIVE-RESTAURATION est recommandé comme composite de comblement pour toute restauration de classe I, II, III et V lorsque la pulpe vitale n’est pas exposée. ACTIVA est hydrophile et se lie chimiquement à la dent. Ses propriétés mimétiques procurent une restauration esthétique. ACTIVA est résistant aux impacts et étanche contre l’infiltration bactérienne, tout en éliminant les problèmes de sensibilité.

Manuel d'utilisation
FAQs / User Guide
Fiche produit
Applications
Articles et Références
Fiche de sécurité
ACTIVA White Paper
Évaluation Dental Advisor

Références :

activa-bioactive-restorative-1

VR* – Kit : 1 seringue de 5 ml / 8 g + ACTIVA Spenser + 20 embouts
* Teintes : A1, A2, A3

activa-bioactive-restorative-3

VR1* – Seringue de 5 ml / 8 g + 20 embouts (A20N1)
* Teintes : A1, A2, A3, A3.5

activa-bioactive-restorative-2

VR2* – 2 seringues de 5 ml / 8 g + 40 embouts (A20N1)
* Teintes : A1, A2, A3, A3.5

activa-spenser-1

DS05 – ACTIVA Spenser Pistolet mélangeur 1:1 pour seringue de 5 ml

a20n1-1

A20N1 – 20 embouts Automix directionnels, 20 ga

a20n1-1

A50N1 – 50 embouts Automix directionnels, 20 ga

ad20t-2

AD20T – 20 embouts Automix transparents intra-oraux, courts

ad20t-2

AD50T – 50 embouts Automix transparents intra-oraux, courts

ad20r-1

AD20R – 20 embouts Automix transparents intra-oraux, longs

ad20r-1

AD50R – 50 embouts Automix transparents intra-oraux, longs

as20-1

AS20 – 20 embouts Automix transparents

as20-1

AS50 – 50 embouts Automix transparents

Propriétés Physiques

Temps de photopolymérisation :

20 secondes

Temps d’autopolymérisation à 37°C :

3 minutes

Pourcentage du filler (poids) :

56%

Pourcentage de verre ionomère (poids) :

20%

Libération de fluor à un jour :

11,0 µg/cm²

Libération de fluor cumulée à 21 jours :

21,9 µg/cm²

Résistance à la flexion :

102 MPa / 14 790 Psi

Flexion modulaire :

4,3 GPa

Résistance à la compression :

280 MPa / 40 600 Psi

Résistance à la pression diamétrale :

42 MPa / 6090 Psi

ACTIVA Characteristics

14217671_xl
Physical Properties
76983903_XL
Bioactive Properties
26956371_xl
Applications

Applications

Montre des cas restaurés avec ACTIVA BioACTIVE-RESTAURATION. ACTIVA est esthétique et durable et offre une bioactivité continue et durable ainsi que des avantages pour les patients.

clinical-procedure-activa-restorative-A1

Fig. 1: Montre une préparation conservatrice de la cavité sur la première molaire

clinical-procedure-activa-restorative-A2

Fig. 2: Molaire restaurée avec ACTIVA BioACTIVE-RESTORATIVE

Photos du Dr. Leon Katz

clinical-procedure-activa-restorative-B1

Fig. 1: Préparation d’une cavité classe II.

clinical-procedure-activa-restorative-B2

Fig. 2: La dent est restaurée grâce à ACTIVA BioACTIVE-RESTAURATION

Photos de John Comisi, DDS

ACTIVA™ Visite à 53 mois

activa-restauration-56mois-1

Fig 1: Décembre 2012 – Préparation de la dent après la dépose d’un amalgame.

activa-restauration-56mois-2

Fig 2: Mai 2017 – 53 mois après, la restauration avec ACTIVA conserve une excellente esthétique sans trace d’usure ni effritement et ne laisse apparaitre aucune limite.

Photos du Dr. John Comisi

Articles et Références

activa bioactive two year clinical performance
The Dental Advisor : Rapport sur les performances cliniques
activa white paper
Cliquez ici pour voir ACTIVA White Paper
1

Fluoride ion release and recharge over time in three restoratives. Slowokowski L, et al. J Dent Res 93 (Spec Iss A_ 268, 2014 (iadr.org).

2

Zmener O, Pameijer CH, Hernandez S. Resistance against bacterial leakage of four luting agents used for cementation of complete cast crowns. Am J Dent 2014;27(1):51-55.

3

Zmener O, Pameijer CHH, et al. Marginal bacterial leakage in class I cavities filled with a new resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material. 2013.

4

Flexural strength and fatigue of new Activa RMGIs. Garcia-Godoy F, et al. J Dent Res 93 (Spec Iss A)_ 254, 2014 (iadr.org).

5

Deflection at break of restorative materials. University testing. Submitted for publication.

6

McCabe JF, et al. Smart Materials in Dentistry. Aust Dent J 201156 Suppl 1:3-10.

7

Cannon M, et al. Pilot study to measure fluoride ion penetration of hydrophilic sealant. AADR Annual Meeting 2010.

8

Water absorption properties of four resin-modified glass ionomer base/liner materials. (Pulpdent)

9

pH dependence on the phosphate release of Activa ionic materials. (Pulpdent)

10

Kane B, et al. Sealant adaptation and penetration into occlusal fissures. Am J Dent 2009;22(2):89-91.

11

Rusin RP, et al. Ion release from a new protective coating. AADR Annual Meeting 2011.

12

Sharma S, Kugel G, et al. Comparison of antimicrobial properties of sealants and amalgam. IADR Annual Meeting 2008. (iadr.org).

13

Naorungroj S, et al.Antibacterial surface properties of fluoride-containing resin-based sealants. J Dent 2010.

14

Prabhakar AR, et al. Comparative evaluation of the length of resin tags, viscosity and microleakage of pit and fissure sealants – an in vitro scanning electron microscope study. Contemp Clin Dent 2011;2(4):324-30.

15

Pameijer CH. Microleakage of four experimental resin modified glass ionomer restorative materials. April 2011.

16

Microleakage of dental bulk fill, conventional and self-adhesive composites. Cannavo M, et al. J Dent Res 93 (Spec Iss A) 847, 2014 (iadr.org).

17

Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Dental Restorative Material. Girn V, et al. J Dent Res 93 (Spec Iss A) 1163, 2014 (iadr.org).

18

Mechanical properties of four photo-polymerizable resin-modified base/liner materials. (Pulpdent)

19

Singla R, et al. Comparative evaluation of traditional and self-priming hydrophilic resin. J Conserv Dent 2012;15(3):233-6.

20

Water absorption and solubility of restorative materials. (Pulpdent)

21

www.nidrc.nih.gov

22

Spencer P, et al. Adhesive/dentin interface: the weak link in the composite restoration. Am Biomed Eng 2010;38(6):1989-2003.

23

Murray PE,et al. Analysis of pulpal reactions to restorative procedures, materials, pulp capping, and future therapies. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2002;13:509.

24

DeRouen TA, et al. Neurobehavioral effects of dental amalgam in children: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006;295(15):1784-1792.

25

Nordbo H, et al. Saucer-shaped cavity preparations for posterior approximal resin composite restorations: observations up to 10 years. Quintessence Int 1998;29(1):5-11.

26

Skartveit L, et al. In vivo fluoride uptake in enamel and dentin from fluoride-containing materials. J Dent Child 1990; 57(2):97-100.

27

Wear of calcium, phosphate and fluoride releasing restorative material. University testing. Submitted for publication: IADR 2015. (iadr.org).

28

Surface roughness and wear resistance of ACTIVA compared to glass ionomers, RMGIs and flowable composites. University testing. Submitted for publication: IADR 2015. (iadr.org).

29

Pameijer CH, Garcia-Godoy F, Morrow BR, Jeffereis SR. Flexural strength and flexural fatigue properties of resin-modified glass ionomers. J Clin Dent 2015;26(1):23-27.

30

Pameijer CH, Zmerner O, Kokubu G, Grana D. Biocompatibility of four experimental formulations in subcutaneous connective tissue of rats. 2011.

31

Pameijer CH, Zmener O. Histopathological evaluation of an RMGI ionic-cement [Pulpdent Activa], auto and light cured – A subhuman primate study. 2011.

32

ACTIVA BioActive-Restorative: 6-month clinical performance. The Dental Advisor 2015. www.dentaladvisor.com.

33

ACTIVA BioActive-Restorative: One-year clinical performance +++++. The Dental Advisor 2015. www.dentaladvisor.com.

34

Compressive strength and deflection at break of four cements. Daddona J, Pagni S, Kugel G. J Dent Res 95 (Spec Iss A) 0658, 2016 (iadr.org).

35

Surface deposition analysis of bioactive restorative material and cement. Chao W, Perry R, Kugel G. J Dent Res 95 (Spec Iss A) S1313, 2016 (www.iadr.org).

36

Comparison of compressive strength of liner materials. Epstein N, et al. J Dent Res 95 (Spec Iss A) S0653, 2016 (www.iadr.org).

37

Water absorption and solubility of four dental cements. Hall J, et al. J Dent Res 95 (Spec Iss A) S1126, 2016 (www.iadr.org).

38

Shear bond strength of several dental cements. Tran A, et al. J Dent Res 95 (Spec Iss A) S0579, 2016 (www.iadr.org).

39

Repetitive deflection strengths of adhesive cements. Samaha S, et al. J Dent Res 95 (Spec Iss A) S1076, 2016 (www.iadr.org).

40

Fluoride release of bioactive restoratives with bonding agents. Murali S, et al. J Dent Res 95 (Spec Iss A) S0368, 2016 (www.iadr.org).

41

Profilometry bioactive dental materials analysis and evaluation of dentin integration. Garcia-Godoy F, Morrow BR. J Dent Res 95 (Spec Iss A) 1828, 2016 (iadr.org).

42

Staining and whitening products induce color changes of multiple composites. Parks H, Morrow BR, Garcia-Godoy F. J Dent Res 95 (Spec Iss A) S1323, 2016 (www.iadr.org).

43

Profilometry based composite abrasion using different current dentifrices. Lindsay AA, Morrow BR, Garcia-Godoy F. J Dent Res 95 (Spec Iss A) S0318, 2016 (iadr.org).

44

Bansal R, Burgess JO, Lawson NC. Wear of an enhanced resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material. Am J Dent 2016;29(3):171-174.

45

Evaluation of pH, fluoride and calcium release for dental materials. Morrow BR, Brown J, Stewart CW, Garcia-Godoy F. J Dent Res 96 (Spec Iss A) 1359, 2017 (iadr.org).

46

Adhesion of s. mutans biofilms on potentially antimicrobial dental composites. Mah J, Merritt J, Ferracane J. J Dent Res 96 (Spec Iss A) 2560, 2017 (iadr.org).

47

Microleakage under class ll restorations restored with bulk-fill materials. Kulkami P, et al. J Dent Res 96 (Spec Iss A) 2604, 2017 (iadr.org).

48

Fluoride release of dental restoratives when brushed with fluoridated toothpaste. Epstein N, Roomian T, Perry R. J Dent Res 96 (Spec Iss A) 1254, 2017 (iadr.org).

49

ACTIVA Bioactive-Restorative. Two-year clinical performance +++++. The Dental Advisor 2017, dentaladvisor.com.

50

May E, Donly KJ. Fluoride release and re-release from a bioactive restorative material. Am J Dent 2017;30(6):305-308.

51

Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila L. Characterization of fluoride releasing restorative dental materials. Dent Mater J 2018;37(2):293-300.

52

Reznik J, Kulkarni P, Shah S, Chang B, Burgess JO, Robles A, Lawson NC. Crown Retention Strength and Ion Release of Bioactive Cements. J Dent Res 97 (Spec Iss A) 656, 2018 (iadr.org).

53

Boutsiouki C, Lücker S, Domann E, Krämer N. Is a bioactive composite able to inhibit secondary caries. Justus-Liebig-Universitat Giessen, Vaterstetten. Germany 2017.

54

Alrahlah A. Diametral tensile strength, flexural strength, and surface microhardness of bioactive bulk fill restorative. J Contemp Dent Practice 2018;19(1):13-19.

55

Influence of novel bioactive materials on dentinal enzymatic activity. Comba A, Breschi L, et al. J Dent Res 97 (Spec Iss A) 0273, 2018 (iadr.org).

56

Dentifrices, surface roughness and depth loss of restorative materials. Smith JB, Lambert AN, Morrow BR, Pameijer CH, Garcia-Godoy F. J Dent Res 97 (Spec Iss A) 1621, 2018 (iadr.org).

57

Enamel demineralization adjacent to orthodontic brackets bonded with Active Bioactive Restorative. Saunders KG, Donley KJ, Mattevi G. of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 2017.

58

Bioactive materials, demineralization, and shear strength of orthodontic brackets. Donohue J, et al. J Dent Res 96 (Spec Iss A) 3289, 2017 (iadr.org).

59

Roulet J-F, et al. In vitro wear of two bioactive composites and a glass ionomer cement. DZZ International 2019;1(1):24-30.

60

Banon R, et al. Clinical evaluation of a new bioactive ionic resin material (ACTIVA™ BIOACTIVE) in primary molars – a split mouth randomized trial. Ghent University 2018.

61

Omidi BR, et al. Microleakage of an enhanced resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material in primary molars. Researchgate 2018;15(4)205-213.

62

Croll TP, Lawson NC. Activa Bioactive-Restorative material in children and teens: examples and 46-month observations. Inside Dentistry 2018.

63

Sauro S, et al. Effects of ions-releasing restorative materials on the dentine bonding longevity of modern universal adhesives after load-cycle and artificial saliva aging. Materials 2019;12:722.

64

Lloyd VJ, Hunter F, Comisi J. The bio-mineralization potential of various bioactive restorative materials, MUSC 2019.

65

Bhadrad, et al. A 1-year comparative evaluation of clinical performance of nanohybrid composite with Activa bioactive composite in Class II carious lesion: randomized control study. JCD 2019;22(1):92-96.

66

Maciak M. Novel applications of a bioactive resin in perforations, root resorption and endodontic-periodontic lesions. Roots 2018;14(4):32-36.

67

ElReash A, et al. Biocompatibility of new bioactive resin composite versus calcium silicate cements – an animal study. BMC Oral Health 2019;19:194-203.

68

Alkhudhairy F, et al. Adhesive bond integrity of dentin conditioned by photobiomodulation and bonded to bioactive restorative material. Photodyagn Photodyn 2019;28:110-113.

69

Lopez-Garcia S, et al. In vitro evaluation of the biological effects of ACTIVA Kids BioACTIVE Restorative, Ionolux, & Riva LC on human dental pulp stem cells. Materials 2019,12,3694;doi:10.3390/ma12223694.

70

Jun SK. The biomineralization of a bioactive glass-incorporated light-curable pulp capping material using human dental pulp stem cells. Biomed Res Int 2017;doi.org_10.1155_2017_2495282.

71

Abdulla HA, Majeed MA. Assessment of bioactive resin-modified glass ionomer restorative as a new CAD CAM material. Part 1_marginal fitness study. Indian J Foren Med Tox 2020;14(1)865-870.

72

Abdulla HA, Majeed MA. Assessment of bioactive resin-modified glass ionomer restorative as a new CAD CAM material part ll_fracture strength study. J Res Med Sci 2019;7(5)_74-79.

73

Sauro S. et al. Effects of ion-releasing restorative materials on dentine bonding longevity of modern universal adhesives after load-cycle and artificial saliva aging. Materials 2019;12(5)722.

74

Karabulut B, et al. Reactions of subcutaneous connective tissue to MTA, Biodentine, and a newly developed base-liner. Wiley 2020;doi.org_10.1155_2020_6570159.

75

Awad MM, et al. Influence of surface conditioning on the repair strength of bioactive restorative material. J Appl Biomater Func 2020;18.

76

Bishnoi N, et al. Evaluating marginal seal of a bioactive restorative material Activa Bioactive and two bulk fill composites in class ll restorations-an in vitro study. Int J Appl Sci 2020;6(3)98-102.

77

Rouler J-F, et al. In vitro wear of dual-cured bulkfill composites and flowable bulkfill composites. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;1–9.

78

Pires PM, et al. Contemporary restorative ion-releasing materials_ current status, interfacial properties and operative approaches. Brit Dent J 2020;229(7)450-458.

activa-bioactive-restorative-1
activa-bioactive-restorative-recompenses-2
activa-bioactive-restorative-2
activa-bioactive-restorative-3
  • Previous ProduitACTIVA™ KIDS BioACTIVE - RESTAURATION
  • Next ProduitACTIVA™ PRESTO™
  • Accueil
  • Produits
  • Nous contacter
  • Certificats de qualité
  • ACTIVA BioACTIVE
  • Politique de confidentialité
  • Mentions légales
S'inscrire à la newsletter

18 Allée du Fenouil – Zone d’Activités Saint Louis • 84250 LE THOR • FRANCE
Tél : 04 42 04 32 68 • Fax : 04 84 25 26 61

© 2015-2022 PULPDENT® Corporation. Tous droits réservés.

  • Pour vous abonner à notre Newsletter, entrez votre email et acceptez notre politique de confidentialité.

in
Call us: (800) 343-4342
Copy